| Peer-Reviewed

Involvement with Juvenile Justice System as a Motivational Factor for Treatment for Adolescents with Substance Abuse Disorder: Their Parents’ Views

Received: 24 March 2021    Accepted: 15 April 2021    Published: 14 May 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The paper at hand aims at exploring whether engagement with the penal judicial system can affect drug using adolescents’ decision to seek treatment, by studying the relative views and beliefs of their parents. The main research questions are concerned with the parents’ beliefs about the effect of the judicial institutions (e.g. police, prosecutors, judges, juvenile probation officers) and the enforcement of reformative – treatment measures on motivating youths. A Likert-based scale was used as the main data collection tool, as it was considered most suitable with respect to the study’s goals, research questions and theoretical grounding. Data were descriptively analysed using the SPSS software, looking into the frequency distributions and the correlation matrices of the variables of interest. Results show that all parents consider the effect of the judicial institutions’ involvement on the motivation of the juvenile addicted offenders as very significant. According to the participants’ responses, intense policing, the involvement of the juvenile prosecutors and probation officers, the application of a personalized intervention model, the enforcement of reformative measures and the referral - by the judicial authorities - to a rehabilitation program, can all have a decisive effect on an adolescent’s decision to discontinue drug use.

Published in American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajpn.20210902.15
Page(s) 50-58
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Adolescent, Substance Abuse Disorder, Juvenile Justice System

References
[1] Kim, B. K. E., Gilman, A. B., Kosterman, R., & Hill, K. G. (2018). Longitudinal associations among depression, substance abuse, and crime: A test of competing hypotheses for driving mechanisms. Journal of Criminal Justice. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.08.005.
[2] Marshall, I. H., & Steketee, M. (2019). What May Be Learned about Crime in Europe (and Beyond) from International Surveys of Youth: Results from the International Self-Report Delinquency Study (ISRD3). European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 25 (3), 219–223. doi: 10.1007/s10610-019-09425-3.
[3] Belenko, S., & Logan, T. K. (2003). Delivering more effective treatment to adolescents: improving the juvenile drug court model. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25 (3), 189–211.
[4] Zhang, Z. (2003). Drug and alcohol use and related matters among arrestees. ADAM Program. https://www.ncjrs.gov/nij/adam/ADAM2003.pdf.
[5] Lindberg, L. D., Boggess, S., Porter, L., & Williams, S. (2000). Teen risk-taking: A statistical report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED441924.pdf.
[6] Belenko, S., Knight, D., Wasserman, G. A., Dennis, M. L., Wiley, T., Taxman, F. S., & Sales, J. (2017). The juvenile justice behavioral health services cascade: a new framework for measuring unmet substance use treatment services needs among adolescent offenders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 74, 80–91.
[7] Gray, K. M., & Squeglia, L. M. (2017). Research Review: What have we learned about adolescent substance use? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59 (6), 618–627. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12783.
[8] Bath, K., Hawke, L. D., Skilling, T., Chaim, G., & Henderson, J. (2019). The service-seeking profiles of youth reporting a legal mandate or perceived coercion for substance use treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 90, 27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.006.
[9] Miller W. R. & Rollnick S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press, p. 67.
[10] Breda, C., & Heflinger, C. A. (2004). Predicting Incentives to Change Among Adolescents with Substance Abuse Disorder. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 30 (2), 251–267. doi: 10.1081/ada-120037377.
[11] Filias, V. (2000). Introduction to the methodology and techniques of social research. Athens: Gutenberg, p. 73.
[12] Zafeiropoulos, K. (2005). How to do a scientific paper. Athens: Kritiki, p. 71.
[13] Kandasamy, I., Kandasamy, W. B. V., Obbineni, J. M. et al.(2020). Indeterminate Likert scale: feedback based on neutrosophy, its distance measures and clustering algorithm. Soft Comput 24, 7459–7468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04372-x.
[14] Papadimitriou, G., Florou, G. & Anastasiadou, S. (2001). Rating scales: the case of the Likert scale. Minutes of the 14th Panhellenic Statistical Conference, p. 81-88. http://hdl.handle.net/2159/8834.
[15] Kyriazi, Ν. (2002). The Sociological research: Critical overview of methods and techniques. Athens: Ellinika Grammata, p. 70-71.
[16] Gnardellis C., Data Analysis with IBMSPSS Statistics 21, 2013, p. 377-378.
[17] Barberi, D., & Taxman, F. S. (2019). Diversion and Alternatives to Arrest: A Qualitative Understanding of Police and Substance Users’ Perspective. Journal of Drug Issues, 49 (4), 703–717. doi: 10.1177/0022042619861273.
[18] Pitsela, A. (2008). The criminal treatment of juvenile crime. Athens: Sakkoula, p. 288, 298.
[19] Social researches – early intervention - advisory role of the Youth Probation Officer. link www.epimelitesanilikon.gr/pdf/ereynes_parembasi.pdf.
[20] Pantazi – Melista, E. in Spinelli, K. D. (2007). Supporting the juvenile offender. Athens: Sakkoula, p. 142.
[21] Galanou, C. (2009). The minor addicted and the role of juvenile probation Officer. Diki Journal, (June Issue), link: http://www.kostasbeys.gr/articles.php?s=4&mid=1479&mnu=3&id=25409.
[22] European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, (2005). Alternatives to imprisonment – Targeting offending problem drug users in the EU. EMCDDA, Lisbon, 2005. Link: http://www.drugs.ie/resourcesfiles/ResearchDocs/Europe/Research/2005/sel2005_2-en.pdf.
[23] Skandali, P., Vetouli, M., Kerasioti, Ε., Kafetzopoulos, E. & Malliori, Μ. (2015). Early intervention in young users of illegal psychoactive substances with delinquent behavior. Link: http://www.mednet.gr/archives/2016-1/pdf/115.pdf.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Georgia Efstathiadou. (2021). Involvement with Juvenile Justice System as a Motivational Factor for Treatment for Adolescents with Substance Abuse Disorder: Their Parents’ Views. American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 9(2), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20210902.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Georgia Efstathiadou. Involvement with Juvenile Justice System as a Motivational Factor for Treatment for Adolescents with Substance Abuse Disorder: Their Parents’ Views. Am. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2021, 9(2), 50-58. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpn.20210902.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Georgia Efstathiadou. Involvement with Juvenile Justice System as a Motivational Factor for Treatment for Adolescents with Substance Abuse Disorder: Their Parents’ Views. Am J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2021;9(2):50-58. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpn.20210902.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajpn.20210902.15,
      author = {Georgia Efstathiadou},
      title = {Involvement with Juvenile Justice System as a Motivational Factor for Treatment for Adolescents with Substance Abuse Disorder: Their Parents’ Views},
      journal = {American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience},
      volume = {9},
      number = {2},
      pages = {50-58},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajpn.20210902.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20210902.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpn.20210902.15},
      abstract = {The paper at hand aims at exploring whether engagement with the penal judicial system can affect drug using adolescents’ decision to seek treatment, by studying the relative views and beliefs of their parents. The main research questions are concerned with the parents’ beliefs about the effect of the judicial institutions (e.g. police, prosecutors, judges, juvenile probation officers) and the enforcement of reformative – treatment measures on motivating youths. A Likert-based scale was used as the main data collection tool, as it was considered most suitable with respect to the study’s goals, research questions and theoretical grounding. Data were descriptively analysed using the SPSS software, looking into the frequency distributions and the correlation matrices of the variables of interest. Results show that all parents consider the effect of the judicial institutions’ involvement on the motivation of the juvenile addicted offenders as very significant. According to the participants’ responses, intense policing, the involvement of the juvenile prosecutors and probation officers, the application of a personalized intervention model, the enforcement of reformative measures and the referral - by the judicial authorities - to a rehabilitation program, can all have a decisive effect on an adolescent’s decision to discontinue drug use.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Involvement with Juvenile Justice System as a Motivational Factor for Treatment for Adolescents with Substance Abuse Disorder: Their Parents’ Views
    AU  - Georgia Efstathiadou
    Y1  - 2021/05/14
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20210902.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajpn.20210902.15
    T2  - American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
    JF  - American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
    JO  - American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
    SP  - 50
    EP  - 58
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-426X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20210902.15
    AB  - The paper at hand aims at exploring whether engagement with the penal judicial system can affect drug using adolescents’ decision to seek treatment, by studying the relative views and beliefs of their parents. The main research questions are concerned with the parents’ beliefs about the effect of the judicial institutions (e.g. police, prosecutors, judges, juvenile probation officers) and the enforcement of reformative – treatment measures on motivating youths. A Likert-based scale was used as the main data collection tool, as it was considered most suitable with respect to the study’s goals, research questions and theoretical grounding. Data were descriptively analysed using the SPSS software, looking into the frequency distributions and the correlation matrices of the variables of interest. Results show that all parents consider the effect of the judicial institutions’ involvement on the motivation of the juvenile addicted offenders as very significant. According to the participants’ responses, intense policing, the involvement of the juvenile prosecutors and probation officers, the application of a personalized intervention model, the enforcement of reformative measures and the referral - by the judicial authorities - to a rehabilitation program, can all have a decisive effect on an adolescent’s decision to discontinue drug use.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Faculty of Law, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

  • Sections